Temporal lobe: Is it really the 'God spot' of the brain?
Scientists
and researchers around the world have long suspected that religious
experiences, such as God's vision, divination, or revelation, are merely
brainwashing. The American textbooks of 1892 also tried to find similarities
between epilepsy and 'religious sentiment'. The matter was better understood in
the middle of the last century.
In
the 1950's, Wilder Penfield, a neurosurgeon, used to insert electrodes into the
brain and electrically stimulate different parts of the brain to give patients
a response. When a patient was stimulated by inserting electrodes into the
temporal lobe (see picture), many of them would hear a variety of ‘unseen
sounds’, many of which were similar to ‘divine vision’.
This was made even clearer in 1985, when a study by
Norman Geschwind, a neurologist at Boston Veterans Administration Hospital,
first found an association between electrical misfiring in the temporal lobe
and epilepsy. In a similar vein, University of California neurologist
Villayanur S. Ramachandran showed in his study that patients with temporal lobe
epilepsy are more likely to experience religious experiences such as
God-seeing, revelation-receiving.
From these it may be inferred why many of the
promoters of our known religions ‘heard bells’, ‘heard unseen voices’, ‘had
fever with capun’ or ‘fainted frequently’ before receiving ‘revelation’.
Inspired by the results of such research, Michael
Persinger, a professor at Lorentian University in Canada, embarked on another
bold venture. He thought that if electrical variations in the temporal lobe
were the source of religious stimulation, it would be possible to artificially
taste religious stimuli by stimulating this part of the brain, wouldn't it?
Yes, at least theoretically it is possible. Dr.
Parsinger did just that. He artificially inflamed the temporal lobe and made
his famous ‘God Helmet’ for religious obsession. If you wear this helmet on
your head later, it is possible to get a 'religious experience'. About 600
people have been officially tested for wearing helmets since the helmets were
made.
About 70 percent of them said they had some kind of
unearthly feeling. They felt that some supernatural being (or some spirit) was
watching over them. The latai of many experiences is more than a yard. For
example, after a woman wears a helmet, she feels as if she has met her dead
mother.
To another woman, this supernatural being was so
strong that at the end of the test, when the supernatural spirit disappeared
into the air, she began to sob and cry. The whole time British journalist Ian
Cotton wore a helmet, he was deluded into calling himself a Tibetan monk. The
experience of scientist Susan Blackmore seems to be the most interesting in
this case.
He described his experience in the journal New
Scientist as follows:
"I
suddenly felt as if someone was grabbing my leg and twisting it. Then he pushed
me against the wall. The whole thing seemed to me like lightning without
clouds; But the incident was as clear as daylight. At first I was very angry,
then the fear gradually took the place of anger .... ”
Professor
Blackmore later said, ‘The experience I have accumulated in Persinger’s
laboratory is, in a word, unforgettable. I would be surprised if it came out
later because of a placebo effect. '
But not everyone has the same ‘God Helmet’ that
works the same way. The famous scientist Professor Richard Dawkins was once
invited to demonstrate the effectiveness of the God Helmet. Dawkins is a
scientist who specializes in evolution, and is always curious about religion,
miracles, and so on. He is a fierce critic of religion. Never mind calling
yourself an ‘atheist’. Belief in God is a delusion to him, religion is a virus
to him. Many people were curious as to whether wearing such a helmet could
instill in their minds any kind of 'religious feeling'.
Richard Dawkins eagerly agreed to be a guinea pig
in 2003. Dawkins came to Persinger's laboratory and entered the chamber wearing
a helmet. As time came out.
He told the BBC.
"I'm
very disappointed," There was a great desire to see God. But I didn't get
anything except sitting in the chamber and relaxing my head!’’
It seems that rational heads like Dawkins are not
suitable for epilepsy. People like them feel that it is not so easy to hear the
voice of the unseen, or to give divination. So, believers will say,
‘solid-minded’ people like Dawkins are not fit to be prophets! Do theologians
simply say that it takes qualification to get a prophetic man?
But even though he didn't work on Richard Dawkins,
he did it in many, including Susan Blackmore, and did very well. They have
admitted it themselves. And according to Parsinger, if more than 80 percent of
the people in the process he invented had supernatural feelings, it must be
said that things like divine feelings may not be out of the brain. In
Persinger's words, "God did not create the brain, but the human brain
created the mighty God."
Conclusion:
The soul is the earliest human imagination. It is
not properly defined and in the eyes of modern science the imagination of the
supernatural soul is nothing but a false belief. In this article, I have tried
to verify in great detail the concept of soul in the cornerstone of science.
What emerges from this is that the matter of the soul does not fit at all with
the theories of modern science.
Simply put, science has not found any evidence for
the existence of the soul. And as time goes on, the hope of proving the
existence of the soul is gradually turning into misery. In fact, new research
in neuroscience, psychology, physiology, genetics, and evolution has literally
taken the soul off the stage.
That is why Francis Crick, the Nobel Prize-winning
scientist who deciphered the twin-spiral (DNA), said, "A modern
neuroscientist does not need to resort to the religious concept of the soul to
explain the behavior of humans and other animals." In 1921, the scientist
Albert Einstein held the same idea, saying, "The idea of a soul without
a body is completely meaningless and meaningless to me."
Therefore, there is no logical reason to believe in
the existence of the soul if science is to be accepted. Ancient people could
not solve the mystery of birth and death from a scientific point of view and
resorted to the spiritual concept of 'soul'. Modern research in science has
refuted all those old and undefined ideas of meditation. Without the existence
of the soul, scientists today are able to explain the behavior, manners, and
self-consciousness of other animals, including humans. Have even found various
physiological sources of religious unearthly experience.
So my personal opinion is that the soul is an
unnecessary and abandoned concept to explain the existence of life, just as
ether is an unnecessary and abandoned concept in the eyes of physicists today
to explain the movement of light.
But the difference between the soul and the ether
is that with the advancement of physics, it was possible to remove the ether,
but it was not possible to remove the soul, but the abandoned concept of the
soul is still popular with the common people. So many people do nothing for the
peace of non-existent souls!
And in order to hypnotize the common unconscious
people, the cultivation of this weed has been made very popular by the
religious organizations for their own business interests. However, the day will
surely come when the majority of people will not have the spirit to explain
life and death; Don't spend money on shraddha-peace or milad-mahfil or challisa
for the 'otherworldly' peace of the soul. The crematorium will not be destroyed
by cremation or burial, but will donate organs such as the cornea, heart,
lungs, liver, and pancreas to human service. John can benefit sick people). In
addition, the door of practical physiology will be opened for medical students.
Arj Ali Matubbar once set an example by deciding to donate his body to a
medical college.
In this context, he said,
‘...
I have decided to hand over my body to human welfare without turning it into an
object of neglect for believers and a molten substance in the grave. With the
help of my body, the surgery students of the medical college will master the
surgery, and with their help, the sick people will be free from disease and
will find peace. And it is these direct feelings that have inspired me to enjoy
human well-being through medical donation. '
He was inspired to donate his body to the medical
later. Ahmed Sharif, Dr. Naren Biswas, Wahidul Haque and others. The late
worldly singer Sanjeev Chowdhury is a new and proud addition to our list. Let
me inform these socially conscious worldly people about my life.
Author: Avijit Roy
Science writer and online activist



No comments